FreeSVG community discussion forum

I'd say no. Such silhouettes was use in the into to old James Bond movies so...

Rob_s wrote:
I suppose you are right, some of the old opening sequences seem to have been allowed, to be honest I thought all bond movies were PG, wasn't until I checked I learned otherwise, thank got my parent paid no attention, and blockbusters never seem to have minded either:https://www.thejamesbonddossier.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/uk-us-spain-ratings.jpg

Nice. Is it possible to unclaim and image you claimed in error?

Thanks.

And I already see that it has been abused. Examples include
https://freesvg.org/corpjack (political reasons)
https://freesvg.org/Red-e-mail-icon (spam)
https://freesvg.org/gop-america-flag (political reasons)
https://freesvg.org/communism-wallpaper (political reasons)
https://freesvg.org/coexist (religious reasons)
https://freesvg.org/when-you-pirate-mp3 … -communism (political reasons)
https://freesvg.org/refugees-welcome-1573139765 (obviously it may be offensive to racists)
https://freesvg.org/act-of-slavery (obviously it may be offensive to racists)

As well as several more.

Rob_s wrote:
Thanks Liftarn, I figured it would be only a matter of time, Webdevs, I think the report function may need to be only accessible to registered users at some stage, to prevent this sort of abuse.

[FUTURE FEATURE] also a clearly defined standard of acceptable images a sort of moral code of practice need to be written up at some point, so as Liftarn pointed out, we do not find ourselves blocking everything, Once forum user numbers are up, I suggest putting together a focus group made up of registered users where you state the target audience, and we the community then vote on the types of images to be marked NSFW such as: racially motivated / nudity / bad taste / Xenophobia that kind of thing. Or if anyone has any other idea's then please comment.

It's traced from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File … kid001.gif and my trace is also available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File … ow-kid.svg
Perhaps it's more recognizable now.

Rob_s wrote:
Now I get it, in which case you have a valid point, The Webdevs will take it from here.

That seems to be open to abuse. If you can hide any image just by anonymously reporting it. I see that already now several images have been reported because someone disagreed with the political views. I hope a better system will be implemented.

Well, Wikipedia is not censored and Wikipedia:Offensive material may be a place to look.

A policy of appeasement may look appealing. Especially if it helps draw in clicks, but it may backfire and drive contributors away if the artistic freedom is limited by narrow minded bigots.

Wow, that way way blown out of context. I understand the gesture, but to think an emoticon flipping the bird would cause a child to become a serial killer seems unlikely. I find the censorship more troubling. If we censor this harmless figure then we open up a very large can of worms. Are FreeSVG going to bow down to every request to censor something that someone may find offensive?

And some just turned up:
https://freesvg.org/reves-du-matin
https://freesvg.org/silhouette
https://freesvg.org/women-silhouette

They are (sort of) NSFW, but should not be deleted as they are useful.